Spoken vs Body Language
Part One
I am a very vocal person and I love talking, I am always finding my way into conversations. Not speaking at all was very difficult for me I felt frustrated because I wanted to be involved in the conversation. Just sitting there and not speaking felt like I was being useless and I felt like I was the brick wall. At first it wasn’t too hard because I asked my partner to tell me about something that happened to them recently so in a normal situation I would have probably just sat there and listened for the most part with little commentary. The part that got difficult was when my partner had finished their story and we still had time left in the fifteen minute conversation. At that point it became very awkward and it was hard for a new topic to be brought up. I had so many things going through my head that I felt would have been a good transition, but of course I couldn’t speak. At first there was no difference in the way my partner communicated with me but then he had to alter to my absence of communication because then he just started talking about random subjects and the conversation was just here and there with different topics.
For the most part I would have to say my partner was in control of the conversation because I couldn’t talk at all so there was no conversing on my side at all. My partner obviously had to change the topics because I was unable to initiate a topic change. It’s really hard to say who had the power in the conversation, in the beginning my partner had the power because he could talk all he wanted, but when it came to the end of the story I felt like I was the one who had the power because the conversation just ended and it went nowhere and I feel that if I was allowed to talk the conversation could have continued to something more. Overall I believe now, from this experience, that in order for a conversation to actually be a conversation it has to be a balance between the two people.
If I had to take this part of the experience and look at it as if we each represented our own culture, me being the one who does not speak and him being the one who uses spoken language, I believe that my partner would have the advantage of communicating his ideas with his population. I feel like his culture would look at mine like we don’t have any opinions and we cannot speak for ourselves. Almost as if we couldn’t make decisions by ourselves because we wouldn’t be able to communicate anything. Nothing comes to my mind how this might resemble any modern situations because, based off my knowledge, all populations use some type of spoken or symbolic language.
Part Two
When I first started this part of the experiment I thought it was going to be very easy and not difficult at all. What I did before I even started this part was I asked my partner to let me know if I was using any type of physical movements while I spoke so he could remind me that I couldn’t. In the beginning it wasn’t too hard but as we got into the conversation I found myself almost restraining my body. I know that I use a lot of body movements when I talked and so when it got more into the conversation I found it getting harder and more frustrating for me. Since I informed my partner of what the rules were for this part of the experiment he already knew I wasn’t supposed to use body movement and he didn’t really seem to respond differently than he usually would. My partner didn’t have any difficulty understanding me because I was able to clearly vocalize anything I wanted too.
This experiment showed me that you can see a lot of how the person feels by their body movements. It is almost like a whole different conversation you can see and have while have a spoken conversation. Not being able to use body movement felt like the conversation was a little boring because I was just frozen and talking. I physically could not express how I felt about the conversation. I think body movement is very important when it comes to conversing because they can tell you one thing but their body will tell you another. When someone reads a person’s body language they can see how the topic is making them feel without even hearing what they have to say.
The benefits of being able to read body language is being able to tell how someone feels when they haven’t said anything. For example, if someone is sitting in a corner alone with a frown on their face and sort of droopy shoulders, you can tell they are sad. It also allows us to know when we are doing something right versus wrong when speaking to someone else. It allows us to get more in tune with people's feelings.
I’m sure there are people who have a difficulty reading body language but I do not think I would be able to identify someone who wasn’t able to read body language. I don’t believe there is any situation where not being able to read someone’s body language would be a good thing. I think it is very important to read and understand someone’s body language. I think that the body language is where you will be able to get the most reliable information. Everyone can say anything they want whether it’s true or not but I believe body language can tell the truth and it’s hard to hide.
Part 1:
ReplyDeleteGood opening discussion of your experiment.
"when it came to the end of the story I felt like I was the one who had the power because the conversation just ended and it went nowhere and I feel that if I was allowed to talk the conversation could have continued to something more."
Let's explore that a little. Could the illusion of power be related to doing this experiment with a friend instead of strangers? Did you really have power? Could you change topics at will? Ask questions? Steer the conversation where you wanted it to go? And if you did feel this way, could it be because your friends let you do this? If you had engaged in this discussion with a stranger on the street, just how much control would you have had? Would they have patiently tolerated your limited communication or might they have just walked away? Did you really have power? Or did your friend give you the power? In which case, was it really yours to begin with?
I agree with your conclusions regarding which culture had the advantage and the attitudes of the speaking to the non-speaking culture.
"all populations use some type of spoken or symbolic language"
Yes, but that doesn't mean there is never a differential balance of power in communications between two people, correct? To find a real life example of this experiment, we need to find a situation where you have a speaking population and another group that doesn't speak that language, and this results in a power differential, with the speaking culture having power over the non-speaking. We see that in the interaction between English speakers and non-English speaking immigrant populations. Think about how non-English speaking immigrants are treated in Southern California? Are they treated as equals?
Part 2:
You explain your side of this experiment and discuss how difficult it was for you to conduct this... but you don't offer much in terms of how your partner experienced this. Usually the most interesting part of this experiment is the response of the partner. Some have actually gotten angry and stormed out. It would have offered more information for both you and your reader if this had been expanded.
I don't disagree with your conclusions regarding the information we receive from body language, but you are only considering the situation where body language matches and supports the information you receive from spoken language. What does it tell you when the body language doesn't match the spoken language? Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce (which applies to the next section).
Okay on the benefits of body language, but what type of benefits do you get by being able to detect liars? Body language goes far beyond information on emotions and can offer life-and-death information to you.
"...I would be able to identify someone who wasn’t able to read body language."
What about those in the autism spectrum? One of the defining characteristics of autism is the inability to read body cues, which is why they have so much difficult in social situations, particularly with sarcasm and jokes.
"I don’t believe there is any situation where not being able to read someone’s body language would be a good thing."
But is there any situation you can think of where body language might actually mislead you, not because the person is lying but because you don't know how to read the body language? Do all cultures use the same system of body language? They all use different systems of spoken/written language, so why would we assume their body language isn't different? If you travel to another country, can you trust the information you get from their body language?
HI Ayla, I had a similar experience with my first experiment, my partner and I would have conversations about random subjects and it did get a little awkward but I just had to get through it. It was kinda difficult for me to stay quiet as well because I wanted to add more and more to the subject he was talking about but I could do was move my head or arms to agree or disagree. Second Experiment was much easier for me and conversation flowed more naturally. Great Post.
ReplyDelete